In the Maine North Woods --- Better than "Trout Fishing in America" by Richard Brautigan

Dear humble,

Nearly all of my trout fishing is brooks, streams or the occasional beaver pond. Lake fishing (even if I'm getting a few) leaves me cold. Monday I was casting across my favorite pool when I heard splashing. At the head of the pool was a cow moose. We considered each other for a moment. Then, I had a fish on and her calf trotted into view. I had to side-step into the shallows to show non-aggression whilst controlling the fish. She & calf went across the stream. Released the trout; it wasn't as large as the one I already was saving for the next day's breakfast.

Last year (further along in the season) in the very same spot I had a young bull still in velvet wade into the stream before seeing me. We considered each other and I continued fishing. He waded across and shortly a cow, almost certainly the mother, came from the same approach. Very likely the same cow as this year's. She, too, deemed me of little consequence or, possibly, of "natural" consequence. They meandered to the the far bank & browsed their way downstream.

Some few years ago, during Memorial week, I was fishing a smallish stream & a new bright-spot fawn walked right up to me.

You guessed it: all three times the camera was back in the vehicle.

But I'm very lucky all the same. Hope to be lucky this coming week with a party from below the Volvo line; they want to learn both fly fishing & river canoing in just 5 days.

I promise I will keep a moderate mien & straight face the whole time.

... in the north Maine woods,

Pete

aka Pogo

aka The Ent


You can hear humble's radio program for this week on humble's web page:http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/ThisWeek.htmlhttp://www.thehumblefarmer.com/RadCombined.html A page of links to humble's fun-filled radio show.Did you know that Robert Skoglund, The humble Farmer, stands on stages and tells funny stories?Ask humble to entertain you and your friends with dry stories like these:http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/PortlandA.html2/22/07 Christian Science Monitor Profile on humblehttp://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0222/p20s01-algn.html?page=1You can visit humble and Marsha at their Bed & Breakfast on the coast of Maine.http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/BaB.htmlhttp://www.TheHumbleFarmer.comYou are invited to stop by for supper anytime.Robert Karl Skoglund785 River RoadSt. George, ME 04860207-226-7442humble@humblefarmer.com

Without his leadership, we wouldn’t be where we are today.” Senator Lindsey Graham, South Carolina

Heard on morning TV interview on June 13, 2007:

“Without his leadership, we wouldn’t be where we are today.”

Senator Lindsey Graham, South Carolina

I don't think anyone doubts this. I hope to hear this tonight on Letterman.



http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/RadCombined.html

A page of links to humble's fun-filled radio show.Did you know that Robert Skoglund, The humble Farmer, stands on stages and tells funny stories?Ask humble to entertain you and your friends with dry stories like these:

http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/PortlandA.html

You can hear humble's radio program for this week:

http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/ThisWeek.html

2/22/07 Christian Science Monitor Profile on humble

http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0222/p20s01-algn.html?page=1

You can visit humble and Marsha at their Bed & Breakfast on the coast of Maine.

http://www.thehumblefarmer.com/BaB.htmlhttp://www.TheHumbleFarmer.com

You are invited to stop by for supper anytime.

Robert Karl Skoglund

785 River Road

St. George, ME 04860

207-226-7442

humble@humblefarmer.com

US Meddling in Rightwing Consolidation in El Salvador

A friend just came back from El Salvador. She went there with a group of affluent church women who, for 10 glorious days, were hell-bent on rooting out lice and hunger.

She and her friends have no idea why children in El Salvador have lice and are hungry. Joe DeRaymond explains it nicely in the following article, but if you were to ask these women to read the words below, their Christian-republican minds wouldn't allow them to believe it.

Anyone who is really serious about fighting hunger and lice in El Salvador would start by voting out the crowd of parasites presently running our own government who make it all possible.

The humble Farmer

+++

The United States supported a series of dictators and military juntas amidst a sea of violence against the civilian population.

The elites of El Salvador and the rightwing multinational power brokers of the United States put a gun to the head of the Salvadoran people in this election. This election did not achieve democracy for El Salvador; it did not allow the voice of a free people making a free choice.


US Meddling in Rightwing Consolidation

Democracy in El Salvador?

By JOE DeRAYMOND



On March 21 in El Salvador, over 2 million Salvadorans went to the polls, 58% of whom voted for Tony Saca, the Alianza Republicana Nacionalista (ARENA) party candidate for President. Schafik Handal of the Frente Faribundi Marti para la Liberacion Nacional (FMLN) received 36%. I was present at the election as an international observer working with the Center for Exchange and Solidarity (CIS) at a voting center in a small municipality in western El Salvador, Jayaque, where I saw bus after bus with ARENA flags flying arrive at the park, jammed full of voters who evidently made their crayoned "X" over the ARENA banner on their paper ballots. When the ballot boxes were opened after 5 PM, the ARENA vigilantes could hardly contain their glee as they collected fat piles of ballots for their party.

The Salvadoran people had voted, but there was little joy in the decision. In San Salvador on the night of the 21st, after everyone knew the results, an eerie quiet prevailed. ARENA had defeated the FMLN and two other smaller parties who failed to achieve sufficient votes to maintain themselves under Salvadoran election law, but had broken election laws at will, spent 10's of millions of dollars, employed a vicious smear campaign, and enlisted the aid of United States Congressmen and the United States State Department to do it.

ARENA is the right wing party created by Roberto D'Aubuisson in the early 1980's. He was named in the United Nations Truth Commission Report as the intellectual author of the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero in 1980. It remains a far right political party whose main ideological idea is a fervent anti-communism. This approach is described by Joan Didion in her 1982 book "Salvador": "to the right, anyone in the opposition was a communist, along with most of the American press, the Catholic Church, and, as time went by, all Salvadoran citizens not of the right...(the political) left may mean, in the beginning, only a resistance to seeing one's family member killed or disappeared."

The candidate of the FMLN, Schafik Handal, is a stalwart of the social struggles. He represented a party which was born out of the guerrilla army of the civil war which converted itself to the largest political force in El Salvador. Last year for the first time, the FMLN garnered the most votes of any political party in the local and legislative elections.

ARENA started their campaign in August with an intense advertizing campaign introducing the fresh-faced ex-sports announcer Tony Saca. This was over 3 months before a campaign was legally allowed. They painted their blue, white and red colors on almost every light pole in the nation. They employed a vicious smear campaign against the FMLN candidate Schafik Handal, a veteran of the civil war, who was labeled a kidnapper and a terrorist in a personal attack campaign also illegal under the law. The Supreme Electoral Tribunal was paralyzed by the ARENA voting bloc, and no adjudications of these violations of law went forward during the campaign. According to Blanca Flor Bonilla, a Deputy of the FMLN, ARENA spent $55 million of government funds in their massive advertizing campaign.

There was a steady stream of United States government intervention in the process, against the FMLN and in support of ARENA. Since 2003, officials of the United States have been threatening the Salvadoran people with severe consequences if they have the nerve to actually change their governement. The last ambassador to El Salvador, Rose Likens, warned that an FMLN government would have consequences for US-El Salvador relations. State Department functionary Dan Fisk compared Schafik Handal to "firures of the past" such as Daniel Ortega and Rios Montt. When current US Ambassador Douglas Barclay met with Schafik Handal, and the FMLN later published their picture together, he requested they retract the photo and not use it anymore. On February 6, the Assistant Secretary of Western Hemispheric Affairs for the U.S. State Department, Roger Noriega, said: "I think it is fair to note that the FMLN campaign has emphasized its differences with [the U.S] concerning CAFTA (Central America Free Trade Agreement) and other subjects. And we know the history of this political movement, and for this reason it is fair that the Salvadoran people consider what type of relations a new government could have with us."

The Special Envoy of the White House to Latin America, Otto Reich, laid it directly on the line on March 13, in a telephone interview conducted from the ARENA offices in San Salvador: "We would not be able to have the same confidence in an El Salvador led by a person who is obviously an admirer of Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez, as we have today in (ARENA President) Flores." Reich continued to warn that a win by the FMLN would cause a reevaluation of the United States relationship with El Salvador.

In the days before the election, the major daily newspapers ran front page articles about the efforts of United States congressmen such as Dan Burton of Indiana, William Diaz Ballart of Florida, and Thomas Tancredo of Colorado introduced bills threatening remesas and immigration should the FMLN take the Presidency.

Finally, there were many reports of employee coercion in this nation of non-union workers. (Excepting the hospital workers, who in 2002 to 2003 had to strike for many months to avoid a disastrous privatization of the public health system.) Maquila, bank and business employees were told that a Frente victory would mean that their employer would simply leave the country.
The closest analogue to this election I can recall is the 1990 Nicaraguan election, during which the Nicaraguan people were told in no uncertain terms that the economy would continue to be ravaged if they kept the Sandinistas in power. In El Salvador 2004, United States officials and El Salvador elites made it clear that all hell would break loose if the FMLN came to power. In this small nation of 8 million, over 2 million of whom live and work in the United States, and send over $2 billion dollars a year back to their families (remesas), threats against this system of forced migration are taken very seriously.

The Salvadoran people know quite well what these threats mean. There are overtones of Chile's overthrow on September 11, 1973, by forces supported by the United States, as well as the more recent abandonment of the elected government of Aristide to the thugs of the coup of 1991, as well as the bitter memories of the war years of El Salvador, when the United States supported a series of dictators and military juntas amidst a sea of violence against the civilian population.

Leslie Schuld, director of the CIS, which sponsored the largest international election observer project this year (or ever) in El Salvador, stated, "The huge election turnout was a positive sign, but as we review the process we will be making suggestions for improvement. The fact that voters were made to fear for their jobs, their immigration status or their remesas was a setback."

The big losers of the election are the poor of El Salvador, the majority. They will continue to live without health care, clean water, basic housing. 90,000 maquila workers will continue to struggle for $5.43 a day or less, without the hope of unionizing, without government protection for workers'rights. The agricultural sector will continue its plummet, as the small and medium sized farmer will continue to have no credit, and markets will be penetrated with ease under free trade agreements and unfair trade advantages of the United States.

On March 24, three days after the election, the United States Ambassador to El Salvador, Douglas Barkley, came out with a statement that the US government would recognize any government chosen by the Salvadoran people, and that the remesas and immigration policy were not at risk at any time. What a bizarre, cowardly act, days after the election, after he had refused to state this during the campaign, and had even refused to allow a picture of him with the FMLN candidate to be published.

The elites of El Salvador and the rightwing multinational power brokers of the United States put a gun to the head of the Salvadoran people in this election. This election did not achieve democracy for El Salvador; it did not allow the voice of a free people making a free choice.

Joe DeRaymond has been in El Salvador since February 29 on this 6th election mission of the Centro de Intercambio y Solidaridad (CIS). He can be reached at: jderaymond@enter.net.